Blog

The multifarious and marginally edited ramblings of CTP’s human capital. i.e., Our thoughts.

Posts Tagged ‘PR’

How Twitter Has Changed Fan Interaction

Monday, January 30th, 2012

Slowly dying are the days of fans writing to their favorite athletes, then checking the mailbox for an autographed photo, ball or letter in return. Instead, Twitter, Facebook and myriad other social networks are giving fans the ability to connect instantly with sports teams and athletes. And now fans are getting responses that no one expected.

Two New England Patriots players recently showed the power of connecting via Twitter when they surprised fans with tickets to playoff games.

Chad Ochocinco, one of the most vocal athletes on Twitter, provided round-trip flight, hotel and tickets to the Patriots game against the Broncos to a Florida fan who had been tweeting at him for two years. The following week, Wes Welker surprised a fan who tweeted a shirtless, painted photo of himself at the game, which was played in single-digit temperatures. Welker was so impressed, he offered him tickets to the AFC Championship game.

The goodwill the athletes and, by proxy, their team got from each giveaway is hard to measure, but the sports industry is definitely taking notice. With the popularity of  MLB’s Fan Cave and the New Jersey Devils’ Mission Control last year, teams and players are interacting with fans like never before, and Twitter is playing a huge role.  According to @Pro_Athletes, there are more than 4,800 athletes on Twitter from all the major sports organizations. Athletes are using Twitter not only to interact with fans, but to support their sponsorship endorsements and comment on their sports. The recent NFL and NBA lockouts were great examples of how athletes influenced public opinion through their tweets.

Sports marketers spend hours every season dreaming up promotions that will help connect fans with their teams. The power of personable players tweeting back at their fans can be priceless. Although a recent Men’s Journal article suggested that the King of Twitter, Shaquille O’Neal, could make upwards of $5 million through sponsorship deals based on his 4.3 million followers, a monetary value of players’ non-sponsored tweets is still a ways off. But according to a study published in the International Journal of Sport Communication 17% of athletes’ tweets are responding to fans, the highest of all the content they share, and proof that athletes see the value of this interaction. You can be sure that teams are pondering how to leverage the popularity of their players’ interactions on social media, and that dynamic will factor into the ongoing relationships between teams and athletes.

So what’s next? Will fans constantly tweet at their sports heroes, hoping they’ll receive tickets? Probably. Even if they don’t, the one-on-one interaction fans get from Twitter is invaluable. It brings the excitement of talking to a player to their fingertips. And as long as athletes think before they tweet, Twitter will remain a great way to build their personal brands, enhance their teams’ images and transform the fan-athlete dynamic in ways we can only imagine.

Why Lockouts Are Bad PR

Friday, November 18th, 2011

The National Basketball Players Association announced this week it had rejected the latest offer regarding its collective bargaining agreement and now it will be up to the courts to decide the fate of this year’s NBA season. Like the NFL lockout earlier this year, the NBA and the Players Association are arguing about who should get the biggest piece of the pie. When are professional sports going to learn that these lockouts are a huge PR nightmare? Not only are they losing fans and affecting thousands that depend on the business of the games, but in this oversaturated sports landscape, where is the guarantee that everyone will come back when they do return?

And this is coming from a huge NBA fan. I grew up on the San Antonio Spurs and spent several sleepless nights in Boston rooting for my team during the NBA’s last lockout season when the Spurs won their first Championship.

A fellow PR colleague asked me recently, “Who will care if the NBA doesn’t return?” And that’s the key question. Even die-hard NBA fan Bill Simmons told the SportsBusiness Journal’s “Sports Media & Technology” Conference attendees last week that he doesn’t think anyone will care if the lockout gets settled. Simmons continued saying, “You’ve got pro football and college. You have the holidays coming up. Nobody is going around thinking ‘I can’t believe the NBA’s not here.’ ” And he’s one of the sport’s biggest proponents.

And while I disagree with Simmons that fans simply don’t care (ask the thousands in the seven NBA-only markets like San Antonio if they care), I do think he’s got a point that with so many other sports options, will consumers truly miss the NBA? Probably not. They will find other ways to spend the money they would’ve otherwise spent on tickets, concessions and merchandise. And that’s where the NBA and NBPA have a PR crisis on their hands. The NBA is one of the best-marketed sports leagues in the world and has done so much to build up its brand globally and the brands of its players. Yet, it is willing to put all that at risk. And for what?  Billions of dollars that they can’t figure out how to divvy up? A 50/50 split isn’t fair? Try explaining that to your average fan who is struggling to pay his or her mortgage or find a job. That’s not an easy sell. Not when this is the third sports lockout in the past six years and by now, everyone has lost sympathy for professional athletes and team owners.

While personally I’ll be sad if there isn’t an NBA season, the true losers in this scenario aren’t the players or the team owners, but the thousands of arena workers, local businesses and team staff that have no say in the lockout and who are affected by this decision. They are the ones who do truly care about the lockout because for them, it’s their livelihood.

Tell us what you think: Do you think fans will come back to the NBA? Why?

A Blog Post…On Blogs

Thursday, November 17th, 2011

I love mommy blogs. I do. My love began when I first discovered Dooce several years ago, and it’s grown from there. Somewhat odd for my age, I am in no way a part of their “target audience” (sorry, mom—no kids for a long time), but I just think they’re great. Why? Because they’re funny. Insightful. And their kids are cute. They say funny things. These blogs are a glimpse into their lives and things I will potentially encounter in the future (I appreciate the heads up). So you can imagine my excitement as a PR professional at the constantly growing influence mommy (and daddy) bloggers are having in the marketplace and continually shifting media landscape. 

For a cool $40-$45 million Disney recently bought Babble, a parenting news and blog site with over 200 contributing mom/dad bloggers. While it’s a slam dunk for Disney in reaching its target audience, the Wall Street Journal is correct in saying that this begins to blur the lines between advertising and blogs. However, a deal like this only further reinforces the powerful influence this community has, especially one that’s recognized by a company like Disney. For more on Babble, MediaPost also does a nice job explaining.

As PR professionals, we’re always trying to identify influential bloggers. Sites like Babble easily turn into a resource when going through this process. These bloggers have been selected to contribute based on their existing presence in the space, and usually come with a wide network. But this landscape isn’t all burp cloths and sunshine. As with any social channel, content and following are key. We saw this last month as Gannet recently shut down its MomsLikeMe website due to low site traffic. Hopefully the trend continues in the positive direction, while maintaining the authenticity that has catapulted the parent blogosphere into the forefront.

Rocky seas for those ignoring social media, technology

Wednesday, November 2nd, 2011

The Boston Globe recently spotlighted a practice that gave pause to fish eaters in this seafood mecca. It was about a literal “bait” and switch taking place at area restaurants and food stores. The stories exposed discrepancies between what fish is on a menu and what you’re actually eating. “The five-month investigation showed that consumers routinely and unknowingly pay too much for less prized fish or buy seafood that is something other than what is advertised on menus. Nearly half the 183 fish samples reporters purchased at restaurants, grocery stores, and seafood markets were sold with the wrong species name.” Here’s a hint: be careful when ordering the red snapper.

But, as part of the series, Beth Daley and Jenn Abelson wrote a sidebar that revealed something interesting about marketing.

The Globe showed what some in the industry are doing to prove the fish they are serving is what they promised. It used fisherman Steve Arnold to tell the story of Trace and Trust, a program developed by fishermen and chefs to provide quality assurance to their customers.  Immediately after hauling in black sea bass off the coast of Rhode Island, Arnold began taking pictures of the fish with his phone and then tweeting and emailing the photos. “Orders began rolling in before (he) even got back to shore.”  The next night the fish found itself on the plate of diners at Boston’s 606 Congress restaurant in the Renaissance Hotel. Under the program, wait staff provide the diners an ID number and a QR code that allows them to use their smartphone to confirm where and when that fish was caught.

Not only does Trace and Trust allow fishermen to market themselves and sell their catch quickly, it provides them and restaurants the competitive advantage of verifiable freshness. Which is pretty important for those selling fish, especially in light of the Globe reporting. The approach transcends the fishing and dining industries. It’s a model for how all kinds of business – large and small – must begin to think about technology, transparency, social media and the new rules of marketing and communications.

 

Lessons of an anticipated product release

Friday, October 7th, 2011

It was a difficult week for one of the world’s most iconic companies. Obviously, the saddest news from Apple was that its visionary, Steve Jobs, died too young after years of failing health.  While his legacy as an innovator, inventor and marketing genius is secure, some worry about the future of the company he fastidiously built.

Ironically, his death came the day after the company’s first major product announcement since his resignation. That announcement did little to quell the unease of some.

Apple did what is unusual for them – it released an iPhone that was met with a yawn. That’s too bad because the new phone appears to be an improvement over the current version. But for many who follow the industry and the company, that’s not the point. It’s about satisfying expectations. Apple was either tone-deaf or ill-equipped to manage those expectations.

Apple, under Jobs, was masterful in how it elicited panting for the next device. The reveal almost always matched the tease as evidenced by the long lines outside Apple stores and the $100 billion in revenue. The company knew that an Apple product was not a commodity but a desire, a must-have. Jobs was more than a demanding CEO who could drive product development. He helped Apple walk the tight-rope of growing without becoming the faceless monolith with which consumers would have trouble connecting. Instead, Jobs was the brand as much as Apple. Consumers had faith that if he was behind it that was good enough for me.

Leading up to this release Apple not only didn’t have that personality to masterfully sell the product, it didn’t have appropriate radar on what the audience was expecting. It should have understood that analysts, bloggers, consumers were expecting an iPhone 5, not a 4S.  They were speculating about the bigger screen and slimmer form factor. Think about invited guests coming to your house expecting a four-course meal and bottles of Opus One only to be met by fantastic cheeseburgers and a pitcher of Margaritas. Some will be happy but others will be let down. It’s your fault for not doing a better job of understanding their expectations and managing those expectations.

Apple should have been selectively leaking news that this was going to be a 4S and, while the look will remain the same, it will be a much more robust phone with a dual-core processor, better battery, an improved camera, a cool personal assistant and speech recognition feature in Siri and the ability to travel the world with it. Apple could have said on background that it will be the best smartphone on the market and they are doing it without altering the much-loved look and feel of the current phone.

In the end, Apple will still sell tens of millions of the iPhone 4S.  They just won’t get people clamoring for it and looking to trade out of their current phone to get it, which is important in this competitive space. There is an expectation (there’s that word again) that the iPhone 5 will be released next summer with greater fanfare and consumer appreciation. For the sake of CEO Tim Cook and the future of the company without its innovative leader, let’s hope that marks the next great step for a still revered brand.

Back to Top

© 2012 Conover Tuttle Pace. All Rights Reserved.